AIWI / Contact Hub / Government Accountability Project
Government Accountability Project
With over 40 years of experience defending 8,000+ whistleblowers, Government Accountability Project offers unparalleled legal expertise in corporate and government misconduct cases. Their team of specialized attorneys, led by Legal Director Tom Devine (undefeated since 2006), provides comprehensive representation throughout the complete legal process.
While not specifically focused on tech or AI, they’ve investigated legal protections in frontier AI and advocate for stronger employee protection in the tech sector.
Topics
Jurisdiction
US
Fees
Greatly reduced rates
Pro-bono available
Anonymous intake?
No anonymous intake
Overview
What kind of cases are you the right organization for?
Government Accountability Project is a leading organization dedicated to protecting whistleblowers and promoting accountability in both corporate and government sectors. With over 40 years of experience, Government Accountability Project has defended more than 8,000 whistleblowers.
They have a strong focus on legal work–both representation andlitigation–and regulatory advocacy. If you hence find yourself facing especially legal questions, Government Accountability Project might be a good place for you.
They handle a wide range of whistleblowing cases, including:
- Corporate Misconduct: Whistleblowing related to fraud, safety violations, or unethical practices in private companies.
- Environmental Violations: Exposing actions that harm the environment or violate environmental regulations.
- National Security: Exposing illegal and unconstitutional actions at the highest levels of government/military and defending democratic principles from security overreach.
- Civil Rights Violations: Reporting violations of civil rights or discriminatory practices.
- Government Malfeasance: Cases involving abuse of power, corruption, or illegal activities within government agencies.
Why should AI whistleblowers come to you?
Government Accountability Project does not have a strong background in tech or AI whistleblowing. This does not mean that they do not care about the topic (many of their previous investigations e.g. included a tech-angle), and in fact they have previously investigated legal protections in the frontier AI space. However, they are rather generalist in their work and especially bring:
- Comprehensive Legal Support: Government Accountability Project offers a wide range of services, including legal representation, advocacy, and mediation. They help whistleblowers navigate the complexities of their cases and ensure their rights are protected.
- Expertise and Experience: With over 40 years of experience, Government Accountability Project has defended more than 8,000 whistleblowers. Their team includes specialized attorneys and policy analysts who are well-versed in various fields such as public health, national security, and corporate accountability.
- Investigative Power: Government Accountability Project conducts thorough investigations to substantiate whistleblower claims, collaborating with journalists and other partners to expose corruption and drive reform.
- Global Network: Government Accountability Project connects whistleblowers with a network of non-governmental organizations and regional coalitions, providing additional resources and support.
Why do you care about Whistleblowing in AI?
Dana Gold, Director of Advocacy and Strategy, in 2024:
“Tech workers who work in privately held companies like OpenAI are, unfortunately, very vulnerable legally. There is no one law that protects corporate or private employees for reporting the range of serious abuses.”
Gold noted that while Congress passed the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act in 2022, which requires reporting of certain cyber incidents and threats, “there is no whistleblower protection section which would support employee enforcement of the act,” she said.
Gold said she would like to see more leadership in the tech sector and “more proactively embracing the role of employees as early-warning mechanisms to prevent problems that they acknowledge are enormous.”
Given the unlikelihood of a legislative fix, Gold said, “the tech industry can lead in implementing professional ethics standards like engineers, lawyers and doctors have to regulate the tech industry as a profession.”
Past Cases of the Team
Eric Ben-Artzi – uncovering multi-billion dollars security violations
In December 2012, Eric Ben-Artzi publicly exposed multi-billion dollar securities violations at Deutsche Bank after internally reporting inaccurate credit derivatives portfolio valuations. Following retaliation and dismissal, GAP filed a whistleblower complaint for him. Though awarded $8 million by the SEC, Ben-Artzi declined the payment.
Joel Clement – A Climate Scientist Speaks Up
a PhD biologist and former Senior Executive Service advisor on climate change at the Interior Department, was reassigned to an oil royalty office in 2017 as retaliation by Secretary Zinke. Unlike dozens of other reassigned SES employees, Clement blew the whistle, publishing a Washington Post op-ed and filing a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel. He’s now an advocate for scientific integrity in climate science and received the 2017 Joe A. Callaway Award for Civic Courage.
Ongoing: Government Accountability Project v. United States Office of Personnel Management for federal employee protection:
GAP and NARFE sued OPM and President Trump in February 2025. The lawsuit claims Executive Order 14171 illegally strips career federal employees of job protections, violates the Civil Service Reform Act, bypasses proper APA notice and comment procedures, and infringes on Fifth Amendment due process rights. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to block implementation of the order, which would allow political dismissals of previously protected civil service positions
Case Focus
Type Of Cases
Clear law breaking
Possible law breaking
Out of scope: No legal dimension to case, pure public interest
Focus Area
Corporate & Financial Misconduct
National Security
Government Accountability
Environmental Protection
Public Health and Safety
Civil Rights
Timing
As early as possible
Throughout the complete legal process
Barred In
Maryland
District of Columbia
Florida
We may not be the best fit for…
Cases involving small-scale issues that do not rise to a level of serious, broad public interest concern. Cases that would come before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). If your case falls into that category—meaning it exclusively concerns employment discrimination based on age, sex, religion, race, or disability, or it concerns retaliation for filing an EEO complaint—the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) hosts a resource for finding attorneys who represent employees in employment cases: http://exchange.nela.org/network/findalawyer.
Cases involving denial of employment benefits, such as unemployment or workers’ compensation, unless those denials are possible reprisal related to whistleblowing activity. Attorneys who specialize in these cases can also be found at http://exchange.nela.org/network/findalawyer.
Team
Government Accountability Project team is composed of 30+ professionals with diverse expertise in law, advocacy, communications, and policy.
Executive Director and CEO
Louis Clark
Louis Clark has been Executive Director and CEO of Government Accountability Project since 1978, initially serving as legal counsel.
General Counsel
Karen Gray
Karen Gray is General Counsel for Government Accountability Project, joining in 2003 as a staff attorney before assuming her current role in 2007.
Legal Director
Tom Devine
Tom Devine has served as Government Accountability Project's Legal Director since 1979, helping over 8,000 whistleblowers fight retaliation.
Support Offerings
This organization offers the following support offerings to (potential) whistleblowers along their journey.
*If you are looking for mor details on what might be included in each category, scroll further below. If you have questions on their exact offerings, please get in touch with us.
Offerings*
Offered?
Comment
Initial Support & Intake
Inhouse
Legal Support
Inhouse
Technical & Evidence Support
Inhouse
Security
Network
Financial support
Network
Media Support
Network
Post-Resolution Support
In-house
Especially policy advisory work
Psychosocial support
Network